169

ceptionable tlieir breeding and habits, their being identified with opinions and public conduct un­acceptable to those w r ho give the tone to society would operate as an effectual exclusion. Many a woman flatters herself (nine times out of ten quite erroneously) that nothing prevents her and her husband from moving in the highest society of her neighbourhoodsociety in which others well known to her, and in the same class of life, mix freelyexcept that her husband is unfortu­nately a Dissenter, or has the reputation of mingling in low radical politics. That it is, she thinks, which hinders George from getting a commission or a place, Caroline from making an advantageous match, and prevents her and her hus­band from obtaining invitations, perhaps honours, which, for aught she sees, they are as well entitled to as some folks. With such an influence in every house, either exerted actively, or operating- all the more powerfully for not being asserted, is it any wonder that people in general are kept down in that mediocrity of respectability which is becoming a marked characteristic of modern times ?

There is another very injurious aspect in which the effect, not of women's disabilities directly, but of the broad line of difference which those dis­abilities create between the education and cha­racter of a woman and that of a man, requires to